Whoever controls the record
controls the truth.
Built for courtroom scrutiny. Sealed on your device. Witnessed by three independent timestamp systems. Locked in immutable storage that no one can alter or delete.
Claim a Charter seatIn 2025, courts began disqualifying attorneys — not fining them, disqualifying them — for AI-related misconduct. The common thread: no verifiable record of what the attorney actually asked or verified.
Your AI provider built the tool, holds the record, and controls what a court sees. They are the evidence and the witness simultaneously.
In New York Times Co. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 1:23-cv-11195 (S.D.N.Y.), OpenAI spent two and a half months preparing 20 million user chat logs before producing them under court order — deciding what gets de-identified, what format is used, what context is included, and what is omitted. The professional whose conversations those were had nothing that predated the provider's version. Apostillum gives that ownership back to you — sealed before the preparation window begins.
An attorney receives a bar complaint alleging reliance on unverified AI output. She verified every citation manually — but has no record of doing so. Her chat history sits on the provider's servers, unverifiable and outside her control. The careful attorney and the reckless attorney look identical.
The same attorney exports a sealed record showing her 2:14 PM prompt asking the AI to verify citations, the response, and her follow-up corrections — all sealed with three independent timestamps before the complaint was filed. Her diligence is visible and provable.
- Can be edited after the fact
- No proof of when it was taken
- No chain of custody
- Easily challenged in court
- Cryptographically sealed at creation
- Three independent timestamps
- Full chain-of-custody declaration
- Designed for FRE 902(14)
You change nothing about how you work.
It runs silently in the background — a sealed record is created the moment any AI conversation occurs. If you ever need to prove what was said, the record already exists.
Write once. Read many. Delete never.
Every sealed record is written to Amazon S3 Object Lock in Compliance mode — a configuration where no record can be deleted or overwritten through any API operation before its retention period expires. Not by Apostillum. Not by Amazon Web Services. The lock is enforced at the AWS infrastructure level — there is no API path to override it.
The cost of proof is nothing.
The cost of having none is everything.
In 2025, over 200 attorneys faced documented sanctions for AI-related misconduct. Firm policies do not protect you. Records do. At Charter rates, Apostillum costs less than a single court filing fee.
Limited · locked permanently
Article 12 requires automatic recording of events over the lifetime of high-risk AI systems, with minimum six-month retention and broader documentation kept for ten years. Fines reach €35 million or 7% of global turnover. In the United States, over 300 judges have issued AI-specific standing orders, and the ABA's Formal Opinion 512 requires competence, confidentiality, and transparency in AI use. The question is not whether documented AI governance will be required — it is whether your records will predate the requirement.
What people ask before they start.
We built it so that even we cannot lie.
That is not a feature. That is the product.
If anyone — including us — altered a single record, the cryptographic hash would no longer match the three independent timestamps. The math would catch it before any human could.